In Washington-speak, a “full Ginsburg” is when one person appears on all five major Sunday news programs in a single day. The feat was first performed in 1998 by William Ginsburg , the attorney for Monica Lewinsky. Since then, the trick has been performed about 18 times — often by Presidential candidates.
If you are not running for office –and you are doing a Ginsburg, chances are you are running for your life. Even if one or two of the interviews is pre-taped, it is hard on a person to keep their energy up and their talking points down.
White House Communications Director Dan Pfeiffer logged a full Ginsburg this morning. We’ll leave to others to rate the substance of his answers — but the way they were delivered was not impressive.
By far his worst performance was the single show on which he did “a remote” – rather than being on set looking into the eyes of his questioner. His appearance on ABC’s This Week, which at times gives the appearance of a hostage video, is below:
Media Training 101 is to have the interviewee know where to look into the camera. Pfeiffer’s shifting eyes match the demeanor of his answers. And he had a habit of talking way too fast (trying to get it over with?) stepping on his words and phrases and THEN looking off camera to the monitor. He also stumbled badly with one of his answers to George Stephanopoulos where he said “the law is irrelevant” in the IRS matter. Bet he wishes he had that sound bite back.
Pfeiffer needs a lot more practice doing remote interviews — and more importantly — the White House ought to re-consider the wisdom of sending out a single spokesperson and asking him or her to perform in the five-ring circus that the full Ginsburg creates. It didn’t work out too well for UN Ambassador Susan Rice either.
h/t Joe Quimby